In a country that doesn't (officially) recognize state-sponsored religion, whose Constitution says "all men are created equal," where bigotry and bias are abhorred — why do otherwise intelligent and sensitive people feel they can engage in hate speech against gay people?

Despite tenets such as [More...]



We're seeking other writers who would like to monitor news reports and file their discoveries and perspectives here. If you're interested, click here to send an e-mail.



Thursday, December 09, 2004

Personally, I Think Erectile Dysfunction is Rather Controversial

>From RawStory.com:

UCC to Seek Revocation of Licenses for Two Stations Over Ad Ban

December 9 -- The United Church of Christ is seeking to protest the license renewals of two Miami stations that are up for renewal this year by the Federal Communications Commission after an ad welcoming gays and minorities to their church was rejected as ³too controversial² by the NBC and CBS television networks.

>From their release:

CLEVELAND ­ The United Church of Christ today (Dec. 9) is filing two petitions with the Federal Communications Commission, asking that two network owned-and-operated television stations in Miami be denied license renewals for failing to provide viewers ³suitable access² to a full array of ³social, political, esthetic, moral and other ideas and experiences.²

WFOR-TV (a CBS station) and WJVT-TV (an NBC station) ­ whose operating licenses are currently up for FCC review ­ are being challenged because ³there is substantial and material question² as to whether the stations¹ parent companies, Viacom, Inc., and the General Electric Company, have operated the stations in the public interest, the petitions state.

The action stems from a much-publicized decision by both networks to deny an advertisement that makes clear the church¹s welcome of diverse, even marginalized, segments of the population. CBS and NBC have said the all-inclusive ads are ³controversial² and, therefore, amount to ³issue advocacy,² something the networks have said they do not allow.

In a signed statement that accompanies the petition, the Rev. John H. Thomas, the UCC¹s general minister and president, said, ³The religious, ethical and moral right of members of UCC churches and other citizens to have access to diverse programming has been harmed by the refusal of NBC and CBS to carry [the ad], as well as by their failure to carry programming reflecting the full range of religious expression in the United States on their networks and on their owned-and-operated stations.²

Similarly signed complaints from a group of UCC members in south Florida make the case that those who live in the network stations¹ viewing area are being denied a positive message of inclusion.

³Ensuring that all Americans, especially women and people of color, have the opportunity to be seen and heard in today¹s media-saturated culture is vital to free expression,² said the Rev. Robert Chase, director of the UCC¹s communication ministry. ³It gives voice to God¹s rich mosaic and is essential in a full democracy.²

Said Andrew J. Schwartzman, President and CEO of Media Access Project, ³Broadcasters agree to serve the needs of the communities where they are licensed in exchange for receiving free use of publicly owned airwaves. That means everyone, not just people their advertisers care about.²

³The viewing public is harmed when powerful networks can label an ad Œcontroversial¹ and refuse to air it. Repeal of the Fairness Doctrine was supposed to result in the airing of more, not less, Œcontroversial¹ programming,² said Angela Campbell, Director of Georgetown University Law Center¹s Institute for Public Representation. ³It is time for the FCC to re-examine whether some sort of public right of access is required under the Communications Act and the First Amendment.²

Ironically ­ long before the current television ad controversy ­ the United Church of Christ, through its Office of Communication, Inc. (OC, Inc.), has been at the forefront of media access issues for more than 40 years. During the civil rights era, the UCC was the first voice to demand that those holding FCC licenses and authorizations act on behalf of the public interest and be held accountable as stewards of the public trust.

Only three months ago, on Sept. 1, 2004, the UCC¹s Office of Communication, Inc., filed a petition with the FCC to deny license renewals of two television stations serving the Washington, D.C., area for failing to serve the educational needs of children.

³Who would have guessed that it would one day be our voice that was silenced?² Chase said. ³When CBS and NBC refused to  air our commercial because they considered it Œtoo controversial,¹ we found ourselves in the very position as other groups for whom we have historically been advocates.²

Gloria Tristani, OC Inc.¹s managing director and a former FCC commissioner (1997-2001), said, ³NBC and CBS and their stations must be accountable to the communities they are licensed to serve. How can it be in the public interest for television stations to exclude a church¹s message of inclusion?²

The FCC filing was done on behalf of the United Church of Christ by lawyers from Media Access Project and the Institute for Public Representation at Georgetown University.

Link: http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=483


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


No matter who you are or where you are on life's journey, you are welcome at the United Church of Christ.


Oh, Canada!
Write the FCC on Behalf of the Church of Christ
Doing My Part
Conservative Group Values Hate Crimes
Shouldn't They Be Watching What Their Kids Are Wat...
Another Argument for Watching Cable
They're Fortunate The Word "Gay" Only Has Three Le...
A Compassionate Response
CBS and NBC Don't Want Gay People to Go to Church
"She Fails."


10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007