WELCOME &
OUR MISSION

In a country that doesn't (officially) recognize state-sponsored religion, whose Constitution says "all men are created equal," where bigotry and bias are abhorred — why do otherwise intelligent and sensitive people feel they can engage in hate speech against gay people?

Despite tenets such as [More...]


BLOG ROLL



WANT TO BE PART
OF THE GAYMAFIA?

We're seeking other writers who would like to monitor news reports and file their discoveries and perspectives here. If you're interested, click here to send an e-mail.


SEND NEWS
TIPS HERE


CLICK HERE
TO JOIN THE
UPDATE LIST

Saturday, April 02, 2005

Amen!

Here's one Republican's view of the misguided direction the GOP has taken under the Bush administration. I'd like to say "Amen," but I fear I might confuse the fundies into thinking I am supportive of them.

The Grand Old Sectarian Party


31 March 2005 (The New York Times) -- By a series of recent initiatives, Republicans have transformed our party into the political arm of conservative Christians. The elements of this transformation have included advocacy of a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, opposition to stem cell research involving both frozen embryos and human cells in petri dishes and the extraordinary effort to keep Terri Schiavo hooked up to a feeding tube.

Standing alone, each of these initiatives has its advocates within the Republican Party and beyond. But the distinct elements do not stand alone. Rather, they are parts of a larger package, an agenda of positions common to conservative Christians and the now-dominant wing of the Republican Party.

Christian activists, eager to take credit for recent electoral successes, would not be likely to concede that Republican adoption of their political agenda is merely the natural convergence of conservative religious and political values. Correctly, they would see a causal relationship between the activism of the churches and the responsiveness of Republican politicians. In turn, pragmatic Republicans would agree that motivating Christian conservatives has contributed to their successes.

High-profile Republican efforts to prolong the life of Ms. Schiavo, including departures from Republican principles like approving congressional involvement in private decisions and empowering a federal court to overrule a state court, can rightfully be interpreted as yielding to the pressure of religious power blocs.

...I do not fault religious people for political action. Since Moses confronted the pharaoh, faithful people have heard God's call to political involvement. Nor has political action been unique to conservative Christians. Religious liberals have been politically active in support of gay rights and against nuclear weapons and the death penalty. In America, everyone has the right to try to influence political issues, regardless of his religious motivations.

The problem is not with people or churches that are politically active. It is with a party that has gone so far in adopting a sectarian agenda that it has become the political extension of a religious movement.

When government becomes the means of carrying out a religious program, it raises obvious questions under the First Amendment. But even in the absence of constitutional issues, a political party should resist identification with a religious movement. While religions are free to advocate for their own sectarian causes, the work of government -- and those who engage in it -- is to hold together as one people a very diverse country. At its best, religion can be a uniting influence, but in practice, nothing is more divisive. For politicians to advance the cause of one religious group is often to oppose the cause of another.

...During the 18 years I served in the U.S. Senate, Republicans often disagreed with each other. But there was much that held us together: We believed in limited government, in keeping light the burden of taxation and regulation. We encouraged the private sector, so that a free economy might thrive. We believed that judges should interpret the law, not legislate. We were internationalists who supported an engaged foreign policy, a strong national defense and free trade. These were principles shared by virtually all Republicans.

But in recent times, we Republicans have allowed this shared agenda to become secondary to the agenda of Christian conservatives. As a senator, I worried every day about the size of the federal deficit; I did not spend a single minute worrying about the effect of gays on the institution of marriage. Today, it seems to be the other way around.

The historic principles of the Republican Party offer America its best hope for a prosperous and secure future. Our current fixation on a religious agenda has turned us in the wrong direction. It is time for Republicans to rediscover our roots.

John C. Danforth, an Episcopal minister and Republican who represented Missouri in the U.S. Senate (1976-1995), most recently served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.


Read Danforth's entire column here --> http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/editorialcommentary/story/26C4306CF413118F86256FD50037BC49?OpenDocument

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

ADVERTISEMENTS

No matter who you are or where you are on life's journey, you are welcome at the United Church of Christ.


PREVIOUS POSTS

Bush Twins Enlist
Homogenized
I Guess He Was Just Trying to Earn His "Kiddie Por...
The Gays Are Looking Pretty Honorable These Days
It's a Gay Thing -- You Really Wouldn't Understand...
It's a Gay Thing -- You Really Wouldn't Understand...
Welcome to My World
Happy Easter
God Hates Bigots
Reputable? Admirable? -- Jeff Gannon Says "I Am Ne...


ARCHIVES

10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007