In a country that doesn't (officially) recognize state-sponsored religion, whose Constitution says "all men are created equal," where bigotry and bias are abhorred — why do otherwise intelligent and sensitive people feel they can engage in hate speech against gay people?

Despite tenets such as [More...]



We're seeking other writers who would like to monitor news reports and file their discoveries and perspectives here. If you're interested, click here to send an e-mail.



Saturday, May 20, 2006

The Religious Left Is Back — And It Is Good

As someone who has only put one toe into his third decade and really wasn't political until a few years ago, it's hard to keep a measured perspective going when things politically — right here, right now — are not progressing the way I think is best. Some of my older friends have seemed unfazed — which should encourage me but only seems to frustrate me at times. They say: "It all proceeds like a pendulum — action, then reaction. Those folks will gain a little ground, and folks who disagree will be compelled to rise up once again and provide a healthy, effective resistance." To be honest, so far in the George W. Bush reign, I haven't seen this happen significantly enough.

And then I read today's Washington Post, and I suddenly feel like exhaling. "There is a God," I think — and there is a growing number of folks who have started to use their brains and hearts to sense what their religion (and God) is actually attempting to teach them — rather than listening to what some old, white, corrupt men are telling them they must believe.

It's about time. Amen.

Religious Liberals Gain New Visibility
A Different List Of Moral Issues

Saturday, May 20, 2006 — The religious left is back.

Long overshadowed by the Christian right, religious liberals across a wide swath of denominations are engaged today in their most intensive bout of political organizing and alliance-building since the civil rights and anti-Vietnam War movements of the 1960s, according to scholars, politicians and clergy members.

In large part, the revival of the religious left is a reaction against conservatives' success in the 2004 elections in equating moral values with opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage.

Religious liberals say their faith compels them to emphasize such issues as poverty, affordable health care and global warming. Disillusionment with the war in Iraq and opposition to Bush administration policies on secret prisons and torture have also fueled the movement.

"The wind is changing. Folks — not just leaders — are fed up with what is being portrayed as Christian values," said the Rev. Tim Ahrens, senior minister of First Congregational Church of Columbus, Ohio, and a founder of We Believe Ohio, a statewide clergy group established to ensure that the religious right is "not the only one holding a megaphone" in the public square.

"As religious people we're offended by the idea that if you're not with the religious right, you're not moral, you're not religious," said Linda Gustitus, who attends Bethesda's River Road Unitarian Church and is a founder of the new Washington Region Religious Campaign Against Torture. "I mean there's a whole universe out there [with views] different from the religious right. . . . People closer to the middle of the political spectrum who are religious want their voices heard."

Recently, there has been an increase in books and Web sites by religious liberals, national and regional conferences, church-based discussion groups, and new faith-oriented political organizations. "Organizationally speaking, strategically speaking, the religious left is now in the strongest position it's been in since the Vietnam era," said Clemson University political scientist Laura R. Olson.

What is not clear, according to sociologists and pollsters, is whether the religious left is growing in size as well as activism. Its political impact, including its ability to influence voters and move a legislative agenda, has also yet to be determined.

"I do think the religious left has become more visible and assertive and is attempting to get more organized," said Allen D. Hertzke, a University of Oklahoma political science professor who follows religious movements. "But how big is it? The jury is still out on that."

"My gut tells me that all this foment [on the religious left] is bound to create more involvement in politics," he said. "I don't know whether there's going to be more of them numerically, but you don't need greater numbers to have a political impact; all you need is to be more active. You already see that in Ohio and some other states, where Christian conservatives no longer have a monopoly on faith in politics."

Conservative Christian activist Gary L. Bauer said the religious left "is getting more media attention" but "it's not clear" that it is getting more organized.

"My reaction is 'Come on in, the water's fine' . . . but I think that when you look at frequent church attenders in America, they tend to be pro-life and support marriage as one man and one woman, and so I think the religious left is going to have a hard time making any significant progress" with those voters, he said.

The quickening pulse of the religious left is evident in myriad ways:

· More than a dozen books have been published in the past year decrying the religious right's influence in politics. Three have been particularly influential in galvanizing activists: Michael Lerner's "The Left Hand of God: Taking Back Our Country From the Religious Right," Jim Wallis's "God's Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn't Get It," and Jimmy Carter's "Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis."

· The recently formed Network of Spiritual Progressives is holding a four-day conference that began Wednesday at All Souls Church in Northwest Washington. A thousand participants from 39 states are discussing a new "Spiritual Covenant for America" and spent Thursday visiting their members of Congress. Lerner, the California-based rabbi who founded the network, said the conference is partly aimed at countering an aversion to religion among secular liberals and "the liberal culture" of the Democratic Party. "I can guarantee you that every Democrat running for office in 2006 and 2008 will be quoting the Bible and talking about their most recent experience in church," he said.

· The Democratic Faith Working Group, made up of 30 members of the House and scores of aides, has begun meeting monthly on Capitol Hill to discuss faith and politics, opening each session with a prayer. Its purpose is to "work with our fellow Democrats and get them comfortable with faith issues," said its chairman, Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.), a preacher's son who was raised in the fundamentalist Church of God.

· Organizations and Web sites that meld religion and liberal politics have mushroomed since the 2004 elections, said Clinton White House chief of staff John D. Podesta. The think tank he heads, the Center for American Progress, has helped form alliances between some of these new groups — such as Faith in Public Life, the Catholic Alliance for the Common Good and FaithfulAmerica.org — and long-standing organizations, such as the National Council of Churches.

For most of the 20th century — from the Progressive era through the civil rights movement — religious involvement in American politics was dominated by the left. That changed in the 1970s, after the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision on abortion rights, the formation of the Rev. Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority, and, on the left, "the rise of a secular, liberal, urban elite that was not particularly comfortable with religion," said Will Marshall III, president of the Progressive Policy Institute, a Washington think tank.

According to John C. Green, an expert on religion and politics at the University of Akron, and others, the religious left cuts across almost all denominations, drawing in black churches, liberal Roman Catholics and mainline Protestants as well as Jews, Buddhists, Muslims and people who say they are "spiritual" but not affiliated with an organized faith.

It also includes some theologically traditionalist Christians.

Janel Bakker, 28, a graduate student at Catholic University who attends Washington Community Fellowship on Capitol Hill, an evangelical church affiliated with the Mennonite denomination, said she grew up in a "relatively conservative religious home" where "the big issue was considered to be abortion."

But Bakker, who has attended several rallies against the Iraq war, said she now regards poverty, peace and the environment as important spiritual issues ignored by the religious right. "The religious right has assumed that capitalism is the way to go and is the most moral way to organize society," Bakker added. "Young people are questioning that."

Liberal evangelicals are " leaping out of the closet and they are saying 'Enough is enough,' " said Jack Pannell, spokesman for Sojourners, a Washington-based evangelical social justice ministry. "Evangelical Christians are not all white people living in the suburbs and only concerned with abortion and same-sex marriage."

Some groups on the religious left are clearly seeking to help the Democratic Party. But the relationship is delicate on both sides.

"If I were the Democrats, the last thing I would do is really try to mobilize these folks as a political force . . . because I think some of this is a real unhappiness with the whole business of politicizing religion," said Mark Silk, director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life at Trinity College in Hartford, Conn.

The Rev. Joseph W. Daniels Jr., senior pastor of Emory United Methodist Church in Northwest Washington, said a key question for him is whether the religious left will become "the polar opposite to . . . the religious right" or be "a voice in the middle."

"What this country needs is strong spiritual leadership that is willing to build bridges. We don't need leaders who are lightning bolts for division and dissension," he said.

Nonetheless, some observers doubt that the revitalization of the religious left will lessen the divisions over religion in politics. "I do think," said Hertzke, "that, if in fact this progressive initiative takes off, we will see an even more polarized electoral environment than we did in 2004." — By Caryle Murphy & Alan Cooperman, Washington Post Staff Writers

Postscript: The point these writers end on is well-made. Many of us feel religion and politics should be separate. But when you have Karl Rove and other Republicans butt-fucking church leaders for their votes and misguided Catholic bishops prostituting themselves — compelled by Republicans to tell people who they should vote for and attempting to persuade their flocks they are going to hell if they vote a particular way — it doesn't seem likely religion will become an intimate expression any time soon. Thanks, guys, thanks a lot. Flock you.

My glee about this article doesn't rest with thinking Democrats will attempt to pander to religious folks of any ilk. I hope they don't, and – what's more — I don't think they have to. Republicans already have fostered an image of being wolves in sheep's clothing — and they have raised suspicions about religious leaders as a result. Rather, I'm pleased fair-minded Americans are realizing their religious ideals demand they look for something more honest and can help them separate the wheat from the chaff.

God didn't create us deficient — he didn't intend that we must look toward others to decipher our best intentions and what's in our hearts. The way it is supposed to work is that truly religious people should have bedrock strength and should willfully, spiritually demand honest, ethical and responsible behavior from those we choose to represent us — whether they are religious or political leaders. We ought to demand and set the agenda. Those leaders are not supposed to supplant our God-given vision and prerogative, manipulating us to believe they know better and to fall in line with what they propose.

The Republicans have thought they were just "innocently" manipulating people to get their votes — but what they have done is completely ruin religion for many people. It's a shame; it's a disgrace. It's actually a failure (for now) for the concept of religion. However, if good people start believing their faith might impel them to disbelieve and sometimes disobey their human leaders (and this article presents evidence this is happening) we might actually go back to a place where religion can be used to guide, unite and inspire us — rather than separate, manipulate and condemn us.


Blogger Everyday Activist said...

Brilliant post at:

or go to everydayactivism.blogspot.com to find out more.

8:45 PM, May 20, 2006 <$BlogCommentDeleteI

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


No matter who you are or where you are on life's journey, you are welcome at the United Church of Christ.


Today's Lesson: Arlen Specter Is A Hypocritical Pu...
These Concerned Women Should Be Concerned About La...
Mary Cheney's Book Is A Smashing Success!
Associated Press Masters the Obvious
"Mounting" Evidence: Gay Escort Scandal Will Soon ...
Mary Cheney: "The Top Self-Loathing Out Queer On T...
Whatever, Mary!
If Anyone Can Get More Than Jeff Gannon's Typical ...
Reading Between The (Head)lines
A Room Full Of Roses For Aravosis And Spaulding


10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007