WELCOME &
OUR MISSION

In a country that doesn't (officially) recognize state-sponsored religion, whose Constitution says "all men are created equal," where bigotry and bias are abhorred — why do otherwise intelligent and sensitive people feel they can engage in hate speech against gay people?

Despite tenets such as [More...]


BLOG ROLL



WANT TO BE PART
OF THE GAYMAFIA?

We're seeking other writers who would like to monitor news reports and file their discoveries and perspectives here. If you're interested, click here to send an e-mail.


SEND NEWS
TIPS HERE


CLICK HERE
TO JOIN THE
UPDATE LIST

Saturday, April 02, 2005

What Are the Odds? Ask Karl Rove

Science -- and a group of University professors from across the nation -- are confirming what we've all suspected all along.

Scientific Analysis Suggests Presidential Vote Counts May Have Been Altered -- Group of University Professors Urges Investigation of 2004 Election


The absence of any statistically-plausible explanation for the discrepancy between Edison/Mitofsky¹s exit poll data and the official presidential vote tally is an unanswered question of vital national importance that needs thorough investigation.

(PRWEB) March 30, 2005 -- http://uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit_Polls_2004_Edison-Mitofsky.pdf

Officially, President Bush won November's election by 2.5%, yet exit polls showed Kerry winning by 3%. According to a report to be released today by a group of university statisticians, the odds of a discrepancy this large between the national exit poll and election results happening by accident are close to 1 in a million.

In other words, by random chance alone, it could not have happened. But it did.

Two alternatives remain. Either something was wrong with the exit polling, or something was wrong with the vote count.

Exit polls have been used to verify the integrity of elections in the Ukraine, in Latin America, in Germany, and elsewhere. Yet in November 2004, the U.S. exit poll discrepancy was much more than normal exit poll error (and similar to that of the invalid Ukraine election.)

In a recent survey of US members of the world's oldest and largest computer society, The Association for Computing Machinery, 95% opposed software driven un-auditable voting machines, of the type that now count at least 30% of U.S. votes. Today's electronic vote-counting machines are not required to include basic safeguards that would prevent and detect machine or human caused errors, be they innocent or deliberate.

The consortium that conducted the presidential exit polls, Edison/Mitofsky, issued a report in January suggesting that the discrepancy between election results and exit polls occurred because Bush voters were more reticent than Kerry voters in response to pollsters.

The authors of this newly released scientific study "Analysis of the 2004 Presidential Election Poll Discrepancies" consider this "reluctant Bush responder" hypothesis to be highly implausible, based on extensive analysis of Edison/Mitofsky's exit poll data. They conclude, ³The required pattern of exit poll participation by Kerry and Bush voters to satisfy the exit poll data defies empirical experience and common sense under any assumed scenario.²

A state-by-state analysis of the discrepancy between exit polls and official election results shows highly improbable skewing of the election results, overwhelmingly biased towards the President.

The report concludes, ³We believe that the absence of any statistically-plausible explanation for the discrepancy between Edison/Mitofsky¹s exit poll data and the official presidential vote tally is an unanswered question of vital national importance that needs thorough investigation.²

The full scientific report is available here:
http://uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit_Polls_2004_Edison-Mitofsky.pdf

An executive summary of the report is available: http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit_Polls_summary.pdf.

Contributors and Supporters of the Report include:
Josh Mitteldorf, PhD - Temple University Statistics Department
Steven F. Freeman, PhD - Center for Organizational Dynamics, University of Pennsylvania
Brian Joiner, PhD - Prof. of Statistics (ret.) University of Wisconsin
Frank Stenger, PhD - Professor, School of Computing, University of Utah
Richard G. Sheehan, PhD -Professor, Department of Finance, University of Notre Dame
Paul F. Velleman, PhD - Associate Prof., Department of Statistical Sciences, Cornell University
Victoria Lovegren, PhD - Department of Mathematics, Case Western Reserve University
Campbell B. Read, PhD - Prof. Emeritus, Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University
Jonathan Simon, J.D., National Ballot Integrity Project
Ron Baiman, PhD ­ Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago

US Count Votes is a Utah non-profit corporation. It is seeking financial support to complete its "National Election Data Archive" project. The goal of the project is to apply statistical and analytic methods to investigate the integrity of the 2004 elections and to provide for timely verification of the integrity of future elections..

Read the entire report here --> http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/3/emw222958.htm

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

ADVERTISEMENTS

No matter who you are or where you are on life's journey, you are welcome at the United Church of Christ.


PREVIOUS POSTS

Amen!
Bush Twins Enlist
Homogenized
I Guess He Was Just Trying to Earn His "Kiddie Por...
The Gays Are Looking Pretty Honorable These Days
It's a Gay Thing -- You Really Wouldn't Understand...
It's a Gay Thing -- You Really Wouldn't Understand...
Welcome to My World
Happy Easter
God Hates Bigots


ARCHIVES

10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007